When asked about what he thought of the Democratic Presidential primary and whether or not Sen Clinton should drop out of the race, this is what my son Sam had to say (that’s Meet the Press on the TV in the background)…
I shall vomit you out of my mouth Sen Clinton!
I started listening to talk radio.
By personal choice.
And I like it.
In fact, I almost prefer it.
One of my favorite CNN commentators said this of the recent Jeremiah Wright “controversy.”
Now that Sen. Barack Obama has denounced his former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, many of his critics, especially those who call themselves conservative, are happy he has put the dashiki-wearing, American-criticizing former Marine in his place. See, these same voices, many that are allegedly Christian, have reacted with glee by calling Wright a prophet of hate and a race baiter.
They hold themselves up to be so concerned about their fellow brother and sister, yet if you looked at their personal lives, I doubt you’d find many with African-American friends and associates (and I doubt their staffs are the most diverse in the world, but that’s another story)….
Read the whole article here.
The other night Shari and I were sitting on the couch with the TV on. I had Sam in my lap, and he was sitting up, just hanging out, really. I looked up at the TV for like ten seconds, and I looked back down at Sam and I see something like this face…
He was just grinning at me the whole time even though I wasn’t looking at him.
Then the other night at about 3 in the morning I was rocking him to sleep. He had his pacifier in his mouth, and he appeared to be almost asleep. I put my finger in his hand so he could have something to hold, and he grabbed it and started to giggle.
(more photos on the Sammy page).
“The death of Jesus on the cross is the centre of all Christian theology…. The nucleus of everything that Christian theology says about God is to be found in this Christ event. The Christ event on the cross is a God event. And conversely, the God event takes place on the cross of the risen Christ. Here God has not just acted externally, in his unattainable glory and eternity. Here he has acted in himself and has gone on to suffer in himself. Here he himself is love with all his being….”
In The Crucified God, pp. 204 & 205.
Moshe Weinfeld’s Social Justice in Ancient Israel and in the Ancient Near East examines how the Old Testament and other ancient Near Eastern culture tackled the problem of social justice.
In the introduction of his book, Weinfeld points out that the concepts of justice and righteousness are “more associated with mercy and loving kindness or… are to be seen with the context of ameliorating the situation of the destitute.” The point of his book then, is to show that the practice of righteousness and justice in the OT and in ancient Israel is essentially acting on behalf of the poor and less fortunate classes of people.
He compares the practice of Israel with other Mesopotamian cultures: the Mesopotamian kings instituted liberty and freedom when they came into power. This proclamation of liberty appears to be a propaganda tool so as to win over the hearts of the people. For instance, King Cyrus sends the exiles home during the Persian Empire. In Israel’s case, on the other hand, the proclamation of justice and righteousness is done on the part of YHWH. Thus, the sabbatical and jubilee years (established periods of liberation) “were understood as divinely ordained institutions, in which human interests fulfilled no role whatever.”
In other words, the OT calls the people of Israel to consistently pursue justice and righteousness. This is not a negative command (that is, it is not a command not to do something), but a positive command. Justice and righteousness are positive actions, such as feeding the hungry or visiting the sick. Plus, there is a stronger call for the ruling classes to remember the plight of the disenfranchised.
The introduction is intriguing because it contrasts the divine inspiration and general goodwill of justice and righteousness of the OT with the often times oppressive nature of “justice and righteousness” in other ancient cultures.
More to come…
I find that more students in Seminary (at least at Truett) are finding themselves in a strange situation – we don’t really want to work in a church. What is more, we don’t really know exactly what it is that we want to do. And so the big question is: What in the world are we going to do with an MDiv degree?
The common theme is that we all feel called to do the work of God. We want to participate in the ministry of the Kingdom, and we feel that Seminary is one of the best places to learn about that ministry. And at the same time so many of us are frustrated with the traditional/institutional way of doing things – so much so that it leaves a bad taste in our mouths. And so much so that it makes us dread working in a church.
But we certainly can’t support our families and make any kind of income with an MDiv degree outside of the church. So what are we to do? I feel that I would be doing a disservice to the church if I were to work in one right now, namely because my attitude would not be right. At the same time, I need income, and I don’t want to work at Target.
It seems that there are a couple of possibilities to pursue. Church plants are an appropriate option. Establishing a community of believers who are committed to a similar purpose outside of the institution seems like a good option. Another option might be volunteer ministry. One might work full time for a business or teach at a public school and get involved in organizations like Mission Waco. An MDiv would certainly be an asset for this kind of ministry. Then there’s the more difficult road of doing PhD work, which involves more school and more money spent.
But that’s all the ideas I have for now as far as long term plans. I know that there are more of you out there with this problem – I’ve talked to you. Any other ideas? How can we use our MDiv outside of the institutional church?
